Archive for the ‘3D’ Category

Director Werner Herzog’s 3D Documentary of 32,000 Year Old Cave Art

Wednesday, April 20th, 2011

Once again, I found myself staying in my car after getting back home because there’s something on the radio I don’t want to miss.  Attached is a link to Terry Gross interviewing Werner Herzog, where he speaks about his documentary, The Cave of Forgotten Dreams.  The subject matter is fascinating (i.e. cave paintings from 32,000 years ago) and he spends a bit of time talking about 3D filmaking in general.  Enjoy.  Herzog Enters \’The Cave Of Forgotten Dreams\’

Share on Facebook

Careful With That Cable, Eugene.

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

HDMI cables promise so much.  Instead of 3 component video cables and audio cables running to your a/v receiver or to your high definition TV, one HDMI cable will do.  Instead of a 1080i image resolution limit, as with component video, HDMI was designed for 1080P and higher.  Instead of 6 audio channels at lower-than-CD resolution, HDMI gives them at greater-than-CD resolution.  Instead of having to run a separate ethernet cable, future HDMI enabled devices will be networked via the same HDMI cable that carries audio and video.  And, the copy protection that Hollywood enjoys courtesy of the HDMI interface, the entire reason HDMI came about in the first place, is no doubt why the studios are willing to give us movies in high-definition.  They weren’t going to let high definition DVD (e.g. Blu-ray) happen via the component video outputs. Component video didn’t provide a satisfactory copy protection solution.

Yet, anyone who makes his living designing or installing audio/video systems knows that HDMI can add days of unpaid installation time, can cause massive frustration, and can leave customers wondering about who they hired and the wisdom of their a/v investment.  In a massively frustrating and seemingly unknowable way, HDMI often doesn’t work!

Consider what goes wrong with HDMI cables; problems which, by the way, our old component video and audio cables don’t have.  Cable boxes don’t display on TVs when HDMI is used to directly link the two.  Video doesn’t show up on TV screens when HDMI is run through a switcher (e.g. an A/V receiver) on its way to the TV.  Or, consider this teaser, which cost me personally about 8 hours of troubleshooting.  A cable box runs HDMI to a receiver, as does a Blu-ray player. Then, from the receiver, HDMI is run to the TV.   If the customer wants to watch the cable box, the only way is to first bring up the picture from the DVD player!  The knowledgeable folks at Denon recently informed me that this is a known problem.

It’s a rare installer of HDMI who hasn’t had these problems.  Of course, he checks the source component, checks the switcher, checks the display device, and he checks the cable and they all check out fine when used with other associated equipment!  It’s certain combinations of equipment—for the most part unknowable until you try them—that don’t work!  As I was recently informed while attending the above referenced Denon training, a lot of this has to do with poorly manufactured HDMI cables.  They’re not made to the standards that they need to be and, as of now, there is almost no way for the buyer to know.  (Kudos to DPL Labs (www.dpllabs.com) for establishing HDMI ratings for HDMI enabled equipment and for HDMI cables.  Consumers need more manufacturers to sign on to this program.)

Aside from needing quality cables, consumers often need firmware updates to get HDMI to work.  I’ve seen such an update work for a Time Warner cable box.  That customer was lucky Time Warner had an update available.  Just this week I saw a homeowner pay out an additional $580 for a component video and analog audio solution because the necessary firmware update, to get HDMI to work between his Fios box and his TV, isn’t yet available.  The customer is out $580 while the installer spent 8 hours of unpaid labor trying an HDMI amplifier, failed firmware updates, the suggestions of three tech support departments, and various other solutions since repressed by his tormented mind.

But wait—it gets better.  Indications are that component video outputs—which reliably give high-definition (i.e. 1080i) resolution—are being phased out.  This means you may not see them anymore on DVD players or cable boxes or satellite boxes or on A/V receivers.  Furthermore, even if they are present on future products, they will not output HD signals!  And, if you do install HDMI cable and if it does work now, it’s likely still not the kind of HDMI cable that you need to pass full resolution 3D video—OK, you may not care—or that you need to carry the Internet.  I know of only one vendor of such cable.  For those of you pre-wiring your walls, one solution to all this mess is to make sure your a/v designer specs high quality data cable to handle your high resolution audio and video needs, as well as your networking needs.

Share on Facebook

Is 3D Video What Surround Sound Has Been Waiting For?

Friday, June 11th, 2010

Seeing Avatar in 3D in Imax—film not digital, I didn’t want to chance it—was a singular event in my visual entertainment experience.  Seated about 25 feet from a 72.6ft x 52.8ft screen, the experience was akin to being in the scenes myself.  More accurately, it was good enough for the willing suspension of disbelief.  No other 3D I’ve seen is close to being that good.  The technology got out of the way so that the illusion was maintained.  No projectiles were flying at me, for one thing.  This was not gimmicky 3D.  And no aspect of what I was seeing, 3D wise, didn’t seem true.  Minor distortion on fast moving objects was the only visual cue that fell short—and I was looking hard for something to fault.  I did feel dizzy for about 2 minutes when I first donned the 3D glasses, and the image went dark for about a second when I first put the glasses on.

So unobtrusive seemed the 3D that I thought I could easily slip into the same presentation for any drama or documentary.  That is, this wasn’t 3D solely for movement and action– this was better than that.  This was simply a better way to get into a story, because I felt like I was at the story.  I want more of it.

About 3 weeks ago I saw a Mitsubishi DLP display a 3D video game.  It was a good 3D effect, but nothing like the theatrical experience that I had.  The screen needs to be a lot bigger, is what I thought—it was about 65”.  Some days later I saw a 3D demo disc playing on a 65” Panasonic plasma.  Impressive though it was when compared to 2D TV, it was artificial in pretty much the same way as a stereoscope (e.g. the View-Master toy).   I’m not saying I wouldn’t want to watch programming that way, but it was way behind Avatar in Imax 3D.

How far out into the future are we talking about, to get the Avatar experience in the home?  I’ve not seen any other theatrically projected 3D, but by all accounts Avatar is uniquely good.  I think I’d feel better for the prospects of the Avatar experience in our homes if Avatar wasn’t so alone in its quality.  Home projector manufacturers are also disturbingly short on information about when they’ll be selling 3D machines.

Are there some steps in the right direction?  Sure.  Widescreen Review magazine reports that Hollywood already released 16 major 3D titles in 2009.   A search of 3D movies at Blu-ray.com turns up about 19 3D titles, representing a mix of discs available now or available for pre-order or scheduled for release sometime this year.  DirecTV just updated their customers’ receivers—automatically—to receive HD.  DirecTV says they will be showing 25 World Cup games in 3D.  They say that this month will see the launch of 4 3D channels.  Comcast says they’ll be showing up to 25 World Cup games in 3D via ESPN3D—presumably the same games and network as DirecTV is offering.  And, 3D flat panel TVs and Blu-ray players are for sale now, and at prices lower than when flat panel and Blu-ray debuted.

Wouldn’t that be something if video reproduction got as realistic as audio reproduction?  Am I the only one who thinks the juxtaposition of surround sound with a 2D screen is so incongruous that it’s distracting?

I know—them’s fightin’ words!

Share on Facebook